Department of Rainbows
Virtually every leftist Company and University has created a Department of Rainbows (Diversity).
~ Aristotle Sabouni
Created: 2019-07-14 |
Look, I love my LGBT friends and family as much as my friends of all colors and races, but that doesn't mean all radical activists or their symbols are always good.
Activists by nature aren't moderates. So while I can get behind them at the start of their causes (while they are demanding freedom from oppression and equality of opportunity), once the activists take over and they devolve into marxist special interest proclaiming superiority, demanding special privileges, or demanding equality of outcome (instead of equaloty of opportunity)? They lose me.
Rainbow Flag[edit source]
Before the rainbow flag (way back to June 24, 1978), the symbol for gay pride was the pink triangle, because the Nazis used that symbol to denote gays from other prisoners in the concentration camps (for special harassment). I respect the hell out of turning something ugly into something to be proud of overcoming. The rainbow flag is the antithesis of that. |
So the left warned they were going to take over Schools and Universities and miseducate our kids. Then they did it. Or as Orwell put it in 1984, “Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”
The left has been destroying the past and replacing it with a fictionalized (or at least half truth) version that teaches victimhood and grievances, in place of successes and growth. Kids learn to hate everything America was, resent our founding fathers, they want to paint over the imagery and statuary of them, and need reparations for all past imagined wrongs like they're the American Taliban: and we know how well that usually works out. We replaced School with the School of resentment.
The left stunted growth to keep people perpetual children:
- Instead of a few years of work experience and application (apprenticeships), we give them 6 years of shallow theory, a piece of paper saying they've made it, and a mountain of student debt. They start entering the real world later in life, less prepared and with bigger burdens than what we had before. Then tell them they're victims for making bad choices.
- Instead of teaching nuances of the past and the balances of the leaders (how good leaders did bad things, and vice versa), it's black and white. Social justice or not: and since there can never be social justice, the past and present is always a failure -- and they think the key to everything is tearing down and remaking in the vision of a perfect and unattainable future. (Marxism 101).
- Schools teach grievance studies, so that these porto-adults leave school thinking the key to happiness is forcing change on others, instead of learning to accept society as it is (and that the key to happiness is within themselves). This is the road failure and unhappiness as humans resent and resist other humans telling them what to do: so the two sides only learn more animus.
- The leftists of today need safe space and to be protected from disagreement, conflict, and truths they can't handle... otherwise they might grow to value the strength of an argument over the emotional appeals of them. So they are stunted intellectually, and academically by being sheltered from opposing views. They are mentally soft and weak, and they have to cover it up by shouting the opposition down.
- They have to be sheltered from conservatism and ideological diversity (in the name of diversity), they can graduate college without hearing a Conservative speak a view (or at least without their side ridiculing or shouting down the points instead of considering them). They live as cultural provincials, isolated from people who aren't as ignorant and "woke" as they are. Yet their self image is out of whack as they think they are worldly, because many other Universities around the world regurgitate the same mind-numbing consensus drivel. (They think consensus is righteousness instead of actually being right).
The results of that, is that our kids leave college in their mid 20's emotionally far younger than teens of yesteryear. They have more debt, less practical experience, less exposure to those that disagree with them, less capable to form or analyze real arguments, and they demand that the world conform to them (and their expectations) instead of understanding that the key to socialization is adapting to the society you belong to. The less Universities look like real life, the less prepared they are for life.
The solution is they go into the work place and demand it looks more like Universities: artificial reality. This was Google, Facebook and Twitters HR practices: to make it feel like a continuation of college dorm life, so they never had to grow up.
These kids demand a Department of Rainbows, just like the University had.
This is faux diversity, driven by quotas and false measure: where every special interest defines their victimhood, and thus gets special privilege to overcome their special hardships. Without any objective ranking of injustice. And we try to normalize it with special recognitions like:
- African American made-up Holidays like: Kwanza, Juneteenth, Black History Month, MLK (Philanders) Birthday, and so on: if you don't participate, well you must be a racist.
- Then we add Pride Month: not a day but a whole month, because a handful of gay bashings far outweighs the horrors of something like the Holocaust?
- The Jews shouldn't get a day, because they won't let themselves be wiped out by the Arabs/Palestinians.
- But we have 4/20 to celebrate stoner drop-outs: must reward failure.
- International Worker's Day, Labor Day, and so on: must celebrate the leftist causes. No capitalism or free-market day need apply: we must shun or punish success.
- They want to replace Christmas with "Happy Holiday", because the Judeo-Christian values this country was founded on, must be bad to no end all injustice.
- Replace Thanksgiving with Indigenous People's day: celebrate the victims who were also perpetrators of atrocities.
- They attack Independence Day (4th) as unworthy, especially when they don't like the President or some immigration policy that was fine when their side did it.
- And they write articles teaching kids how be disruptive during the other people's Holidays to politicize them and divide families along grievance boundaries: this would be a good time to bring up "Trump is a racist", and get outraged and leave if any family member is more informed on the nuances.
And the goals are ever shifting. If they aren't, people will see through the sham, or recognize the flaws. So the language, and cultural values must shift constantly to keep the weak minded believing the state/collective is always right, and not think for themselves.
Examples:
- In the 60s you need to be a feminist (believe in equality of opportunity). By the 70s and 80s, you needed to believe in quotas and equality of outcome. In the new millennium you need to deny that gender exists at all (and men in Women's sports is a preference).
- In the 70s "the man" government was untrustworthy. In the 2000s, you need government to tell us what to do or we'll destroy the environment.
- In the 80s green was about polluting less and no Nuclear power, in the 2000s it's about eliminate CO2 by going to environmentally distructive Solar and Wind power, and avoiding cleaner and less CO2 emitting Nuclear power.
- In 2008 Obama talked about the issues of illegal immigration -- so that we could afford better domestic social programs. A decade later, not allowing Open Borders is racist.
- Even the language is constantly being redefined. In a place where language is constant, then good ideas beat bad ideas. But if you control the language and torture it, people get distracted and have to fight semantics and the shifting landscape, and so bad ideas can beat good ideas. That's the only way the left can win. To the point where man and woman, he/she, and everything needs to be re-defined. You can't have babies any more, you need to have theybies -- because otherwise you're forcing a gender on your child and oppressing them.
Conclusion[edit | edit source]
It turns out if you teach victimhood, that means the kids will grow to be oppressed. Instead of growing up thinking what a wonderful world or nation this is, and to go out and take advantage of opportunities, they focus on suffering. And since you can't eliminate suffering (it's part of life), they are doomed to live their lives unhappy, and doomed to misery... until they grow out of it.
The left says suffering is wrong, and we have to tear apart our society in order to fix it. But everyone suffers. It is how you react to it that defines your ethics. The left reacts by demanding that we put special people in companies to try to control the ever shifting vogue minority interest. Yesterday it was gays, today it's transgender, tomorrow it'll be muslim oppression -- but they'll keep shifting around what companies need to do to show they care. And since they can't succeed at changing human nature on a dime, every time the whims of the far left changes, they'll be perpetually failing, and those that follow them will be unhappy rubes, looking for guidance on what to get upset over next.
❝ Do you realize that the past, starting from yesterday, has been actually abolished? If it survives anywhere, it's in a few solid objects with no words attached to them, like that lump of glass there. Already we know almost literally nothing about the Revolution and the years before the Revolution. Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book has been rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street and building has been renamed, and every date has been altered. And that process is continuing day-by-day and minute-by-minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right. ❞
|
🔗 More
| |
| |
🔗 Links
More:
- Michael Knowles on Candace Owens show: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nuh2XZ-gLcs
Tags: Organizations Orwell