Election 2020 - Background

Background or opinions on the 2020 election. Background or opinions on the 2020 election. ℹ️ Info           ~ Aristotle Sabouni Created: 2022-09-30

Election 2020 • [6 items]

• 2020 Biden Win Upsides - Trump won, but I'm calling it for Biden/Harris. Trump didn't win by enough that the left won't steal the election...
• 2020 Outcomes - Progressives: the ends justifies the means. Force matters more than persuation. Intent matters more than outcome.
• Election 2020 - Biden - Biden just called the Presidents family and demanded he concede the election. Unfortunately he called the Reagan family.
• Election 2020 - Not Voter Fraud - Not everything that looks like voter fraud is voter fraud.
• Election 2020 - Quotes - Some people sum up problems in a few words. That's not an affliction I suffer from.
• Krugman on Election Legitimacy - Claims Biden is the first to face an opposition that doesn't accept his legitimacy, ignore NYT/Krugman on Bush and Trump.

2020 Biden Win Upsides

           Main article: 2020 Biden Win Upsides

Trump won, but I'm calling it for Biden/Harris. Trump didn't win by enough that the left won't steal the election from him (or at least undermine America), like they did to Nixon and tried to with Bush, and don't get me started on Tammany Hall, JFK, Johnson and FDR. But a Biden Win isn't all bad - the democrats win the little victories but lose the war: We've survived horrible Democrat administrations before (FDR, Jackson, Johnson, JFK, Wilson, Obama, Carter), and we will again. Democrats they always fed backlashes against themselves. If you want Republicans to win in the future, just give Democrats what they asked for today. So this isn't the end, but it could be the end of the Democrats at least for a generation that is exposed to what Democrats have to offer. Nobody informed will buy the mainstream media again. Any right-wing blog or News source offered more accurate predictions than NYT, CNN or WaPo. Citizen journalism thrives as the Mainstream Media keeps shooting their credibility in the face. Nate Silver is once again shown as the sports-clown, well out of his league in politics, that he's always been. Polls will never be trusted by anyone but rubes and democrats. That means people will have to think for themselves, instead of trusting the media/polls to tell them what to think. Big Tech may have pushed too far, and are starting to get the retaliation they have earned. If Republicans hold the Senate, closed in the house, gained in states, this will be a relatively minor victory and they just aren't going to get much done. (They can't stack the Supreme Court, or add DC and Puerto Rico as a way to stack the Senate, as long as Republicans hold the Senate). And there's some serious downsides for the left Trump won bigly with intelligent Blacks and Latinos, not to mention blue collar working stiffs. I don't know if Trump comes back in 2024, or he just goes on to be like Obama the heckler -- only with his own TV Station. But some of his recipe will remain. Take on the media head-on! Don't cave to cancel culture and the left. His coalition shows that conservatives are willing to put up with some of the same coarseness from their side as the left has always tolerated. And he was more diverse in 2020 than in 2016 -- more blacks, latinos, asians and women. That shows that even the disenfranchised are waking up to how bad the dems are. Over time, that's going to leave a mark. The DNC has alienated all but coastal elites and urban/suburban rubes who want free shit and identity politics. But their coalition is so fractured, that it can't survive for long -- their interests beyond undermining American interests are just too misaligned to hold for long. Joe and Kamala in the same administration divides them further. If Joe is the progressive puppet, they alienate the sane Democrats to avoid the 25th Amendment coup. But if he has a backbone and pretends to be a moderate, then the Kamala faction will be outraged. They want both extremes and they can't have them both at the same time. What Democrats pass won't be enough for their progressive wing, and what they do pass will be a disaster, so either way they earn resentment. If the economy doesn't do gang busters under the Senile Joe and Comrade Kamala's dictates (and odds are it won't), we may see a bigger shift that dissolves the DNC as a working organization. Democrats can't hide from what they own. So the odds of Republicans taking the house in 2022 and Presidency in 2024 are high. The odds that this burns down the Marxist Sex-worker as the future of the DNC is high. And that burns down the AOC faction as they rip the mask off the Democratic Fascist wing of the progressive party. I don't know how the Democrats survive in middle America with a fake African American Marxist as the best they have to offer.

2020 Outcomes

           Main article: 2020 Outcomes

Here's a point I've made but some choose not to get it, "it doesn't matter what you think or feel, it's about what THEY believe". Progressives think forcing someone to do something is winning: because they get their way. And that's why leftist Governments fall. Laws don't change people. People believing something and agreeing with the law does. Government runs by the consent of the governed. If you didn't win their consent, passing a law that nobody agrees with, just creates criminals and wastes law enforcement efforts (or empowers corruption/abuse). Examples: Civil War Progressive Unrest in the progressive era (turn of 20th century) Prohibition War on Drugs Abortion bombings after Roe V. Wade It turns out just because you say, “we decided X” from the ruling elite, that it doesn’t matter if the people don’t agree (consent). They just ignore, we get more criminality. Convince the people, then make the laws.. not the other way around. So you win an election that was corrupted by Democrats? Even if they didn’t cause the election to be swung (or at least not provably so), if you convince 72M+ Americans that the Democrats are the party of corruption and abuse, and their president has no legal authority, it doesn’t end well.

Election 2020 - Biden

           Main article: Election 2020 - Biden

Joe Biden just called the Presidents family and demanded he concede the election. Unfortunately he called the Reagan family. While Trump won, historically the Democrats cheat, the media covers and takes the leftist side, and the Democrat wins as an illegitimate candidate that the press fawns over. 1948 LBJ stole the Senate Seat from Coke Stevenson, which allowed him to be VP, and then President. 1960 JFK stole the election from Nixon, also with the help of LBJ (who he put on the ticket because of his history corrupting Texas elections). Texas and Illinois mob, put JFK over the top. 2000 Bush/Gore was an example where the President did legitimately win, and the Press was outraged and attacked Bush and ignored the corruption/cheating 2008 Obama/McCain was an example of lots of cheating happened, but Obama would have likely won anyways. The press covered for the abuse. 2016 was an example where Hillary's side cheated, but the Press covered by attacking Trump with a fake Russia narrative that was later debunked. If Biden wins, and Republicans made gains in the house, hold the senate, won all over State and local elections, this isn't that bad. I have full faith that America will survive a Harris/Biden presidency. But if there was corruption of the election and the investigation is suppressed, that's putting our democracy at risk of disenfranchising 70M votes and voters. Every legal vote should count.

Election 2020 - Not Voter Fraud

           Main article: Election 2020 - Not Voter Fraud

However, that these claims are credible shows that people ARE paying attention to Democrats chicanery and are losing faith in our process (for some very good reasons). And these things are easily fixable with better quality controls (like voter role sanitization) that Democrats have obstructed for 40 years. Evidence includes: 118 year old Michigan Man votes by absentee ballot - Did the Detroit give and count an absentee ballot from a 118-year-old dead voter, as a video or FB post shows? Yes, but they claim it was just a clerical error and it went to his son (who is still alive) and he filled it out for himself. But that doesn't change that a dead man voted and got miscounted (even if it was a 1:1 trade). 2020 Hammer and Scorecard - Hammer and Scorecard was Hardware and Software developed to manipulate voter tallies in foreign elections, and some are claiming it was used against the American people in 2020, in ways that are showing up as election anomalies. While possible, there is little direct evidence, just circumstancial. PA livestream filling out ballots - There was a live stream of counters filling out ballots (Delaware County). Facebook "Fact Checkers" said that it was OK and not voter fraud, because the election board claims they were just transcribing ballots from damaged ones to more reliable ones. But they were violating the rules to do it on the general floor, without observers signing off, etc.

Election 2020 - Quotes

           Main article: Election 2020 - Quotes

"I sure hope Trump doesn't create a constitutional crisis by making up a conspiracy about election fraud and then pushing it for three years when he knew all along that he had made it up because that would be really bad" ~ @JoshDunn "Joe Biden got more than any other President in history (74M), yet did not swing a single state house, lost seats in congress, and will only change the Senate if they win a revote in Georgia. Which means 10's of millions of voters only filled out the top of the ticket. What are the odds?" ~ Me (from something I read) "The election was the worst American sports: the players were out of shape and past their prime, the cheerleaders were ugly and had stupid signs, the commercials were horrible, and the refs were embarrassing with their bad calls." ~ Anonymous

Krugman on Election Legitimacy

           Main article: Krugman on Election Legitimacy

"[Joe Biden] will be the first modern U.S. president trying to govern in the face of an opposition that refuses to accept his legitimacy..” ~ Paul Krugman Ignoring that Krugman himself called Trump "illegitimate" a few times, not to mention thousands of lefties at left wing media. They did the same to George Bush for a while. NYT sort of corrected themselves, by first stealth changing the quote to make it look not quite as bad. Then when they did admit the mistake, they implied it was a few left wing outlets (and failed to admit that it was them and Paul Krugman that had both questioned the legitimacy of Trump and Bush). Real journalists don't act like that. But Democrat operatives posing as journalists do.

---

🔗 More

Election 2020 Election 2020 - The polls were off, the media/Social was manipulative, the counts are dubious, and there was cheating.

Tags: Election 2020/all