George Mason University
From iGeek
GMU did studies of Climatologists and found 73% thought there was proof of global warming, 56% finds IPCC untrustworthy.
~ Aristotle Sabouni
Created: 2017-03-29 |
George Mason University did the largest study of Climatologists in 2007 and found:
- While 84% thought Global Warming existed, only 73% thought there was proof
- "existed" is a far lower standard than the IPCC's "man caused 90% of Global Warming"
The 2010 follow-up they found:
- "56% find IPCC untrustworthy”
- "63% believe global warming is caused mostly by natural causes
- Only 31% believe "humans are primarily responsible”
- Only 24% "see any evidence of climate change in their local weather patterns"
- "61% say there is a lot of disagreement among scientists about whether or not global warming is happening”.
All blowing up the idea that there's consensus, or agreement with the IPCC.
2010 George Mason University[edit | edit source]
After their 2007 Survey, they decided to do a follow up of with their meteorologists and found:
- "63% believe global warming is caused mostly by natural causes, and only 31% believe humans are primarily responsible”
- "56% find IPCC untrustworthy”
- Only 24% "see any evidence of climate change in their local weather patterns"
- "61% say there is a lot of disagreement among scientists about whether or not global warming is happening”.
- All of which completely refutes the whole scientific consensus.
- http://www.climatechangecommunication.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/2010-A-National-Survey-Of-Television-Meteorologists-about-Climate-Change_Preliminary-Findings.pdf
- https://www.heartland.org/policy-documents/majority-broadcast-meteorologists-skeptical-global-warming-crisis
2007 George Mason University[edit | edit source]
This found that:
- 84% of Climatologists thought AGW “existed"
- Only 73% thought there was proof of that point
- And as we’ve discussed, “existed" is a far lower bar than, “man’s CO2 is causing 90% of the warming".
👁️ See also
- Climate - The Climate is always change, the debate is over the cause and consequences. Where there's no debate, there's no science.
- Climate Models - Seriousness comes when Climate Model developers have code reviews, and publish their code, documentation, and data.
- Climate Religion - Climate "Science" has all the tenets of being a religion (or Cult). Believe the high priests: or else.
- Electric Cars - Electric cars are great for the tech side, but their green cred is in dispute.
- Ocean Warming - Fake environmentalists, re-release scares about how everything is worse than they thought; the oceans are warming more.
- Paris Climate Accord - A fake agreement that let the largest polluters do what they wanted, while the U.S. would be punished for being better.
🔗 More
| |
| |
Tags: Climate Study NoIndex Consensus Skeptic