George Mason University

From iGeek
GMU4C.jpg
GMU did studies of Climatologists and found 73% thought there was proof of global warming, 56% finds IPCC untrustworthy.
GMU did study of Climatologists in 2007 and found that 73% thought there was proof of global warming. The 2010 follow-up found: "56% find IPCC untrustworthy”, "63% believe global warming is caused mostly by natural causes, and only 31% believe humans are primarily responsible”, "61% say there is a lot of disagreement among scientists”. e.g. No 97% IPCC consensus.
ℹ️ Info          
~ Aristotle Sabouni
Created: 2017-03-29 

George Mason University did the largest study of Climatologists in 2007 and found:

  • While 84% thought Global Warming existed, only 73% thought there was proof
    • "existed" is a far lower standard than the IPCC's "man caused 90% of Global Warming"

The 2010 follow-up they found:

  • "56% find IPCC untrustworthy”
  • "63% believe global warming is caused mostly by natural causes
  • Only 31% believe "humans are primarily responsible”
  • Only 24% "see any evidence of climate change in their local weather patterns"
  • "61% say there is a lot of disagreement among scientists about whether or not global warming is happening”.

All blowing up the idea that there's consensus, or agreement with the IPCC.

2010 George Mason University[edit | edit source]

After their 2007 Survey, they decided to do a follow up of with their meteorologists and found:

2007 George Mason University[edit | edit source]

This found that:

  • 84% of Climatologists thought AGW “existed"
  • Only 73% thought there was proof of that point
  • And as we’ve discussed, “existed" is a far lower bar than, “man’s CO2 is causing 90% of the warming".

GeekPirate.small.png


👁️ See also

  • Climate - The Climate is always change, the debate is over the cause and consequences. Where there's no debate, there's no science.
  • Climate Models - Seriousness comes when Climate Model developers have code reviews, and publish their code, documentation, and data.
  • Climate Religion - Climate "Science" has all the tenets of being a religion (or Cult). Believe the high priests: or else.
  • Electric Cars - Electric cars are great for the tech side, but their green cred is in dispute.
  • Ocean Warming - Fake environmentalists, re-release scares about how everything is worse than they thought; the oceans are warming more.
  • Paris Climate Accord - A fake agreement that let the largest polluters do what they wanted, while the U.S. would be punished for being better.

🔗 More

Climate
The Climate is always change, the debate is over the cause and consequences. Where there's no debate, there's no science.

Consensus
Science is skepticism. If someone isn't a skeptic, then they're not a scientist: they're a politician.



Tags: Climate  Study  NoIndex  Consensus  Skeptic



Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.