Would you rather be burned or buried alive or shot in the head by a sniper? Semantics pretends the latter is worse.
~ Aristotle Sabouni
Created: 2022-06-10 |
Quick, would you rather be burned alive, beaten to death, tortured or shot in the head by a sniper? (With no other options).
Semantic tricks by the left (like tracking "mass shootings" instead of "mass murders" and excluding government "massacres") are done to dupe the gullible into believing that private guns and shootings are more prevalent or the worst option. They aren't, and banning guns may make both shootings worse, or the alternatives worse.
While we'd rather nobody had to die; if they are going to be killed by crazies, then winning isn't replacing shootings with bigger shootings, bombings, fire attacks or getting run over by trucks. And in countries that controlled guns, we've gotten all of those. So if you here someone trying to address mass shootings, and not mass murderers or massacres? Then you know they don't care about the victims, they are just standing on their coffins to further their agenda of being anti-gun.
Outcomes[edit | edit source]
- Australia got mass murderers to shift from guns to fire bombing apartment buildings (and killing more).
- Canada got mass murderers to shift from guns to more guns and truck attacks
- Europe got more shootings, bombing and truck attacks
What none of them has ever done with gun control, is mass murder control. Because it focuses on the wrong issue.
To the victims, or the families, murder is the problem -- not the tool used. And honestly, being shot to death might be a better way to go, than tortured, burned or raped to death.
🔗 More
| |
| |
| |
Tags: Main Page Guns Mass Murder FAQ
