Not for gangs?
From iGeek
75-80% of gun violence is gang related, so Democrats blocked Republican efforts to get Red Flag laws applied to Gangs.
~ Aristotle Sabouni
Created: 2019-10-14 |
Democrats excuse was that gang databases have been found to be inaccurate at times. That's not wrong, but it's not as bad as the No-fly lists, or the error rates of red flag laws in general. So they're protecting gang members in ways that they won't protect non-gang members. That's either stupid, hypocritical, dishonest. Pick one (or more).
Red Flag Laws[edit source]
Main article: Red Flag Laws
Red Flag laws sound reasonable (flag people that are threats, and take their guns away temporarily), but they aren't implemented that way. Everywhere it's been tried, it's been abused and gotten people killed. If you can't implement it in a way where it wouldn't be abused by other individuals or government, then how is it reasonable? |
🔗 More
| |
🔗 Links
Gang Bangers aren't red flag worthy, only innocent white guys:
- https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/congress/democrats-frown-on-targeting-gang-databases-with-red-flag-laws
- https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/congressional-dems-red-flag-confiscations-are-good-for-joe-sixpack-but-not-for-gang-members/
- https://hotair.com/archives/jazz-shaw/2019/09/24/democrats-dont-want-red-flag-laws-applied-gang-members/
Tags: Red Flag