2000 Mules
Documentary on the criminal voter fraud and ballot stuffing during the 2020 Presidential Election.
~ Aristotle Sabouni
Created: 2022-05-08 |
| 🗒️ Note: |
|---|
| This movie is longer and looser than it needs to be. If you care, you should watch it to be informed. But it could have been edited MUCH tighter, and pointing out the arguments against it, and refuting them better. |
D'Souza released a film (2000 Mules) based on research by True the Vote, which showed 2,000 people (ballot mules) that visited 10 different polling stations AND 5 different far-left nonprofit fronts for the DNC, all in the same evenings, leading up to the election. (Or 54,000 mules that visited 5 polling places and 3 different far-left nonprofit fronts for the DNC).
They had video of some of them dumping many ballots, often late at night, wearing gloves and taking photos of the dropboxes -- which all fits a pattern of getting paid for an illegal drop (and evading evidence trails), in an election with extremely funky results, where laws were broken and Joe Biden (highly unpopular) got more votes than Historic Obama did (highly popular).
FakeNews and partisan reviewers are trying to bury the story/movie. Fake Fact-Checkers are working overtime to try to make excuses for why this isn't proof, ignoring the point that this is serious evidence that discredits the claim that there was no anomolies or cause for concern with the 2020 election results. Which makes the movie more important, not just for the claims, but the attempted suppression of even discussing the points.
In the end, the movie doesn't have the ability to open a leftists mind, or change anyone's opinion that doesn't want to be changed. But the rational will look at it, and admit that there's plenty of justification for anyone with integrity to want to investigate the claims, if for no other reason that to assuage the voters concerns. That the media/left doesn't want to investigate and discredit these claims, is more damning than the movie itself. Why doesn't the left want to know the truth?
I think likely that some of the suspicious activity was not illegal or fraudulent, despite how it looks. But that more of it was exactly what it seemed. And the left knows that. And if you can show it, you can prove that the right wanting quality controls on election, and the lefts resisting of all them and trying to lower voter standards and quality, is for the most obvious of reasons. The left benefits from cheating, and is sure they can't win as often without it. If they had faith in their claims, they would be demanding investigation and vindication, instead of suppression and censorship and attacking anyone that quesitons.
Film Critics[edit source]
If you want to see leftist bias in media, you just have to look at all the examples of how far off from their reviewers are from their viewers. I use the spread as a predictor of whether I'll like a film. Big spread with audience over critics? I'm going to like it. But big spread with critics over audience? I'll usually side with audience.
| Tatometer | Summary |
|---|---|
 |
2000 Mules - Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic won't review it. Wikipedia won't create a separate entry for it, and the only blurbs they allow are negative and Fake Fact Checks by far left institutions like the AP. |
Facts[edit | edit source]
- The likelihood of Biden getting more votes than Obama, and breaking every statistical norm, all bellweather counties and metrics we've used, and pulling out a win, is beyond credulity. That's not proof. But if you flip heads 100 times in a row, it only makes sense to investigate the coin, not attack everyone who is dubios as a conspiracy theorist.
- Rigtht before the 2020 election, the Democrats changed the rules to allow fraud-ridden mail in voting (Warned against by Jimmy Carter), and they often did it in ways that were later ruled against the law. This should have nullified the election for those states. They also broke many other rules, like keeping envelopes with ballots, you could post-adit validate them for signatures, source, or verify date/time. Many ballots were submitted after allowed time, and by destroying envelopes you could never track back problems to source and get convictions.
- Ballot harvesting is illegal in the states they tracked. There's a small carve out that you can drop off ballots for a family member.
- TrueTheVote found 2,000 people (ballot mules) that visited 10 different polling stations AND 5 different far-left nonprofit fronts for the DNC, all in the same evenings, leading up to the election. Or 54,000 mules that visited 5 polling places and 3 different far-left nonprofit fronts for the DNC. Often late at night. This was up to 810,000 fraudulent votes, in just 3 states, that they found.
- They also took video evidence (from the ballot boxes that had vide) and showed people dumping many ballots, and taking photos of the dropboxes, as a way to get paid. (Show that they were there).
- Cameras and video was required on these ballot drop boxes in many states. And many of those boxes didn't have working cameras or "Lost" the footage, which should nullify all the ballots in those boxes, because the chain of custody was broken and laws not followed.
- They had one whistleblower (from San Luis, Arizona) admitting this was going on, and there was a pay per vote scheme.
- The censorship of this movie is belied by it's success. It made $1M in it's first 12 hours. Not a huge hollywood take. But for an abscure talkumentary, it's likely the biggest release of the year, and will encourage others to no fear a lack of Hollywood or Mainstream Media support. A win for citizen journalism. [1]
Refutation[edit | edit source]
Fake News and Fake Fact Checks are claiming that it's not proof. The far left can't really argue rationally that this isn't suspicious and worthy of investigation. So they flim-flam and distract, while ignoring that it's highly unlikely to be anything other than criminal.
Their defense is:
- Cell phone data is only accurate to a few meters, so you know they were in the area at odd hours, after going by DNC activist fronts -- but that's not proof they actually put anything in the box. They ignore that there's video evidence of them doing that in many cases.
- Since many dropboxes were in high traffic places, it's possible that non-mules just happened to travel by 10 different dropboxes and 5 different DNC fronts, on the same night (and NOT have done that on any days before or after around the election as those were filtered out). Like Delivery drivers, postal workers, cab drivers, poll workers. That's why we should ignore whether this has any validity, and NOT try to check it out and validate.
- While there was video of people dropping multiple ballots illegally, and there was tracking data, the AP and others question whether those were the same people. But that ignores that they still had video of crimes being committed. Though a few of the drops might have been someone dropping off ballots for their entire family... but we can't prove/disprove it.
- Since one Philidelphia DNC Offical (Pennsylvania state Sen. Sharif Street) claimed that he traveled a route that was likely to have triggered TrueTheVote, and he was not ballot stuffing, and his staff carried 6 devices, he could have been responsible for many of those events. Please ignore the 1,149 others.
- Just because in Atlanta many of the mules were also at all the local Antifa riots doesn't prove they were Democrats or Ballot Stuffing. It just strongly hints at both. Again, the point is that they don't think this should be investigated, because it might show something the Democrats don't want to know.
- Just because the ballot droppers were wearing gloves, after another ballot stuffer got caught by their fingerprints, doesn't mean that they were wearing gloves to prevent fingerprints. Practically everybody wears blue gloves in public while dropping many ballots (where such behavior is illegal).
- Taking Photos of the ballot box after you dropped in many ballots, could be for any number of reasons besides verification of delivery. Despite virtually no ballot box selfies trending as a "thing".
- Leftist Water Carrier Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger said, “Those are still lawful ballots, but they’ve just been handled fraudulently with, obviously, the ballot harvesting.” Um, we don't know that they are lawful ballots since they broke the chain of custody by being handled fraudulently -- that makes them unlawful just by the process they were delivered.
What the Democrats are doing is the usual, you have to prove that there was a crime, before you can investigate whether there was a crime. Innocent until proven guilty is a platitude used in court, but it's not valid before court. Cops arrest you based on suspicion of guilt, not proof of it. So the defenses that Dinesh or TrueTheVote haven't proven a case to appease the Court of WaPo, is irrelevant. The question is always whether they showed enough suspicious activity that it should be investigated, or that the public officials failed to do their job in securing the election, thus the far left claim that this was "the most secure election in history" despite being the least secure, having the most statistical and legal anomolies in modern times, is specious.
Videos[edit | edit source]
2000 Mules Trailer  |
|---|
This is just the official trailer. |
| 2000 Mules |
|---|
This is a teaser, or a way to watch the movie if you've paid. |
| Dan Bongino |
|---|
IRREFUTABLE Evidence From '2000 Mules' Has The Leftist Media In A Panic |
🔗 More
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
🔗 Links
- https://www.2000mules.com/
- Wikipedia:Dinesh_D'Souza#2000 Mules (2022)
- https://www.imdb.com/title/tt18924506/
- Wikipedia:True_the_Vote
- https://www.truethevote.org/
- https://electionfraud20.org/2000-mules/
- https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/may/6/letter-to-the-editor-2000-mules-based-on-hard-fact/
- https://video.foxbusiness.com/v/6305297926112#sp=show-clips
FakeNews / FakeFactCheck
- AP
- Far-Left Merc reposting AP
- WaPo Fake Fact Check Bezos Blog does their usual DNC water carrying.
- RedState Fact Checks the Fake Fact Check
Cat=
Tags: Movies Reviews Documentaries AP 2020 Election Anomalies
