| ποΈ Note: |
|---|
| Both my Parents died due to the panic caused by the fearmongers. My mom wouldn't see her cardiologist due to fear of hospitals/COVID despite angina, and she had a heart attack and died for an easily addressable blockage. My Father delayed getting checked out, despite many pains/issues -- and by the time he went in, his potassium levels were dangerously low, and he stroked out while they were finally bringing them up. |
The initial IFR (fatality rates) was estimated to be β3.5% and an R0 of β2.5 (contagiousness) due to poor testing methodologies and exaggerated claims.
The actual numbers fall to numbers as low as 0.003% (for those under 20), and are 0.3% below 60. Even if you're over 70 with other chronic conditions / comorbitities, the death rate was lower than WHO claimed.
| The vaccines were not targeted to the at risk, but spread through the entire population. And later variations/mutations were more virulent to adapt. |
- You get what you incentivize, and over-reporting every death as COVID was incentivized. The media, medical professionals/hospitals, politicians, schools, and individuals were all incentivized to exaggerate deaths and death rates (and maximize fear). There were cases where a kit was hit by a car, but tested positive (with an unreliable and overly sensitive test), and thus it was reported as a COVID related death. An abortion, workplace accidents, it was all COVID deaths. They had people with stage 4 cancer, their systems shutting down... but if an administrator said they might have had COVID, it was COVID.
IFR is what matters (Death versus total infections), so the media/left reported CFR (deaths versus verified infections), because it made the disease look deadlier.
IFR (Infection Fatality Rate) is deaths to all infections. Since β85%+ of infections were asmptomatic, and unreported/traced, the media used CFR (Case Fatality Rate), this is a much smaller verified cases versus deaths. Making the disease look more lethal.
| Either they were all incompetent, or they were intentionally maniplating the gullible. |
Outliers as News.
The media/left sensationalized the extremely rare death/hospitalizations of young outliers. It could hit anyone. But they were careful not to offer context to understand how rare cases and deaths were.
| This fear as a weapon was used to keep people locked up in homes, keep schools locked down, and so on. They also didn't share the studies that showed that even when young people got it, they were usually asymptomatic, and didn't have a viral load high enough to spread it well to others. There were almost no cases where teachers were catching it from students. And K-12 was not significant transmission vectors, as most that caught the disease, caught it somewhere else -- even where schools were open. |
- Efforts by medical professionals to correct disinformation were suppressed, censored, and those who offered the studies/facts or caution about the over-inflated exaggerations or context were often attacked or fired. That's not science, that's politics.
- April 2020, I'd found at least 16 scientific studies that proved infection rates were WAY higher (thus death rates way lower) than was being shared with the public. It was obvious the public was being lied to, and the need for lockdowns was a fraud. This was April 2020. We didn't remove the lockdowns for a couple more years. Democrats were intentionally hurting the economy, destroying business, ruining people for their politcal agenda.
|
