Roe v. Legal Review

From iGeek
LawReview.png
No Legal Review has ever come up with a substantive defense of Roe. Which is why the distract with whataboutism.
No Legal Review has ever come up with a substantive defense of Roe. Yale Law, Harvard Law, Justices White, Ginsberg and Rehnquist, Archibald Cox, Liberal law professors Alan Dershowitz, Cass Sunstein, and Kermit Roosevelt. They've all hammered it as legal garbage, that stopped legal progress on abortion. Which is why the left goes with emotional appeals, instead of the law.
ℹ️ Info          
~ Aristotle Sabouni
Created: 2019-09-23 

Virtually all legal review determined it was a bad ruling:

  • Yale Law: Professor John Hart Ely It "is not constitutional law and gives almost no sense of an obligation to try to be."[1]
  • Harvard Law: Professor Laurence Tribe, "behind [Roe's] own verbal smokescreen, the substantive judgment on which it rests is nowhere to be found."[2]
  • Justices White and Rehnquist, “By the time of the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment..., there were at least 36 laws... limiting abortion... thus the drafters did not intend to have the Fourteenth Amendment withdraw from the States the power to legislate with respect to this matter.
  • Archibald Cox wrote: "[Roe's] failure.... Neither historian, nor layman, nor lawyer will be persuaded that all the prescriptions of Justice Blackmun are part of the Constitution."[3]
  • Liberal law professors Alan Dershowitz, Cass Sunstein, and Kermit Roosevelt all expressed disappointment with Roe decision.

The only people that agree with it, are either ignorant, don't give a shit about the Constitution, rule of law, or ethics: they just want to get their way.


GeekPirate.small.png


👁️ See also

  • Abortion - Abortion is a deeply personal view, but someone's views on it is a window into their soul.
  • Abortion/Toastmasters - I did a toastmasters speech (2008) on my views on Abortion.
  • Abortion/Life or Choice breakdown - The majority of Americans are both for and against abortion. Most want it more restricted, but legal (in some cases).
  • Abortion/By Party - General support/opposition for abortion is nearly the same across parties.
  • Abortion/By Term - The vast majority of Americans want more restrictions.
  • Abortion/Number per Year - ≈800K abortions per year, or twice as many American deaths as WWII.
  • Abortion/By Ethnicity - Margaret Sanger founded planned parenthood on the idea of exterminating inferior brown babies, so they'd stop outbreeding white ones.
  • Abortion/Why? - Abortion for Health of Mother (2.8%), Health of Fetus (3.3%), or rape/incest (>1%), total = <6%.
  • Abortion/Why late term? - The vast majority of late term abortions are not about "Fetal Problems", or "health of the mother". It's irresponsibility.
  • Abortion Limits - The far left lies, and pretends any reasonable restriction is a "war on reproductive rights".
  • Roe v. Wade - Roe v. Wade fits my personal beliefs (1st Trimester legal, 3rd illegal), but it was a lousy and Unconstitutional ruling.
  • Roe is Judicial Activism - "Blackmun’s papers vindicate every indictment of Roe: invention, overreach, arbitrariness, textual indifference"
  • Roe v. 10th and 11th Amendments - The dissenting opinion pointed out that the 10th and 11th both disagreed with Blackmun's interpretation of the 14th.
  • Roe v. 14th Amendment - Blackmun used 14th Amendment as an excuse for enacting Roe. But the authors, ratifiers, others never noticed it before.
  • Roe v. Legal Review - No Legal Review has ever come up with a substantive defense of Roe. Which is why the distract with whataboutism.
  • Planned Parenthood - Planned Parenthood is an abortion mill wrapped in the facade of being about Women's healthcare.


🔗 More

Roe v. Wade
Roe v. Wade fits my personal beliefs (1st Trimester legal, 3rd illegal), but it was a lousy and Unconstitutional ruling.


🔗 Links

Tags: Roe Slides

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.