Digital Kristallnacht

Biden supporters demanded and acted on Digital Kristallnacht: attacking/banning conservatives on Social Media to heal us. Under the urging of Biden administration and supporters, Social Media enacted Digital Kristallnacht: ripping through 7,000 Conservative individuals, digital businesses and communities on Social Media, breaking windows, banning, and blocking, in order to harass and ban them, all in the name of faux healing and unity. ℹ️ Info           ~ Aristotle Sabouni Created: 2021-01-09

• Before he's even inaugurated, Joe Biden's supporters demanded and acted on Digital Kristallnacht: attacking conservatives on Social Media in order to find unity for the cause and spreading hate and division in the name of healing. The least historically informed will think I'm being absurdly hyperbolic... it was only 7,000 digital businesses that were destroyed instead of physical ones damaged, but the black-hearted idea is the same, "if you disagree with us, we will put you in a digital reservation / concentration camp and remove you from our version of civilized society".

• This polarization (and Biden's silence) sets up the ultimate litmus test: do you support this, or are you an American? The 1A is fundamental to being America, and opposition of it, has become fundamental to being a Democrat in good standing.

• The President of Mexico (Lopez Obrador) spoke out immediately against it, as did Russian Dissident Alexei Navalny showing they are more American than Joe Biden, his supporters, and the majority of the American media who supported it or remained silent.

Anyone that is not outraged over Big Tech's Executive Order 9066 and the digital interment of the Trumpanese, is not a good person.

Thought Crime

Democrat activists like Zuckerberg and Dorsey helped steal an election by suppressing truthful information in violation of their mission statement and terms of service. They decided that they got to block Donald Trump, not for things he actually said -- but on things that they imagined he meant. (Plus Michelle Obama asked them to). Exactly what Orwell warned about in 1949 as the iron curtain was beginning to descend on East Europe and Socialism was starting to undermine liberty in the UK (and hasten the decay of the Empire). Google, Apple and Amazon took it a step further, and attacked Parler (an alternate platform for conservative voices), because they won't suppress free speech and enforce thought crime (in the way that Google, Apple, Amazon thinks it should be enforced).

What were Donald Trump's thought crimes?

• Zuckerberg said he was worried the president aimed to use his time left in the White House to undermine the transition of power to President-elect Joe Biden. Not that he had done anything wrong, but that he might. So he was permabanned from Facebook.
• Twitter (Jack Dorsey) claimed that Trump was "glorifying violence" and that's why he was removed. But a cursory look at Dorsey's delusions and it was all the voices in his own head.

What did Trump tweet that was so bad?

❝ To all of those who have asked, I will not be going to the Inauguration on January 20th ❞ ~ Donald Trump ℹ️ Tweet #1

He opted out of the innaugeration that the left didn't want him at (and demanded he stay away from). That bastard! How DARE he!

Twitter claims that while Trump had said and tweeted that he lost the election, and that there would be an orderly transition of power, that this tweet nullified that previous statements, and was a dog whistle, based on no actual evidence. To them, this was Trump demonstrating that that the election was not legitimate, and to offer "encouragement to those potentially considering violent acts that the Inauguration would be a “safe” target, as he will not be attending."

Of course we know if Trump had tweeted that he was going to inauguration, the same voices in their head would have screamed that he was only going to protest that the election was not legitimate, and offer encouragement to others to act up with him as an audience. Heck, the Democrats didn't want Trump there anyways -- knowing he would upstage their glorious leader with his mere presence. And if he was there, the left would have attacked him for any expression he made... or for more remaining expressionless and wooden. "Orangeman is bad" is the lens they view everything he says or does, so bad that those who disagree with them must be punished, and any action is rationalizable to them. Hmmm... where have I seen similar behavior before?

Twitter went on to claim there was also a prior tweet (previously blocked) where AFTER Trump had denouncing the violence at the Capitol, told all protestors to respect the blue, and to go home, Trump had conceded the election, and said there would be an orderly transition of power, he tweeted,

❝ The 75,000,000 great American Patriots who voted for me, AMERICA FIRST, and MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, will have a GIANT VOICE long into the future. They will not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way, shape or form!!! ❞ ~ Donald Trump ℹ️ Tweets that had been previously been blocked as too incendiary

The fact that this is far less incendiary than many of Biden, Obama or Harris's tweets completely escapes their hypocrisy meter, While anyone literate knows Trump is alluding to previous censorship by Twitter/Facebook, and that he was planning on launching or working with a competing service (as he's mentioned many times before). To the Thought Police at Twitter:

• "American Patriots" is being used to describe support for those who committed violent acts at the US Capitol.
• “GIANT VOICE long into the future” and that “They will not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way, shape or form!!!” is being interpreted as further indication that President Trump does not plan to facilitate an “orderly transition”

Trump said "The 75,000,000 great American Patriots who voted for me"... NOT "to the people who committed the violence the other day" -- but Twitter knows what he meant to say, so you have to trust them, not the President. So with no evidence supporting their absurd conspiracy theory, and by ignoring all the evidence to the contrary -- like what he actually said supporting the peaceful and orderly transition of power, they banned him for what they imagined he thinks, despite him saying the opposite.

Any intelligent analysis of the claims Twitter made on him violating their policies versus reality of what he said/did, show that they are delusional or dishonest. They didn't ban him for what they claim. They banned him because of other reasons, and any of those other reasons are invalid (they don't like him, his politics, etc). Twitter broke their own terms, they deserve to be sued for that breach of contract. Obviously Cardinal Richelieu and the leftist mob (and Dorsey), think alike,

❝ If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him. ❞ ~ Cardinal Richelieu ℹ️ Disputed quote, but still quite relevant

🗒️ Note:

I do not put many litmus tests on my friendships, and fewer on what constitutes being a good American. To me, it’s a stupid way to live, always quantify and filtering your friendships based on agreement. That being said, if you support this, send me a message before you unfriend me, so that I can block you and put you on a permanent list of people not to associate with. I'll be cordial at work or when I run into you socially. But you are not a friend or family to me, as you were not there for me or America when it counted. While I have a live and let live attitude, I also have a “do no harm” attitude as well. It's not about my feelings or agreeing with me. It's that your actions demonstrate a cruelty towards people who are not like you (a willingness to hurt others, or tolerate it, for a political agenda). And I can't be friends with that any more than an active pedophile, racist, homophobe, anti-semite or violent criminal. If you fuck up and are working on reform? Then we can be friends (I don't expect perfection, and offer forgiveness). But for people in denial? I just want a better life by not having bigoted hate-mongers around.

Excuses

           Main article: Digital_Kristallnacht/Excuses

The Water Carriers and apologists on the left are are coming up with excuses like:

• (a) it's a private company... that is a platform like the Phone Company or Radio, which the Government and the Supreme Court has already agreed does not have the same freedoms to censor as individuals, since they are providing a public service.
• (b) they are only blocking one extremist billionaire - if you ignore that event billionaires deserve rights and protections, and the 10,000 others they censored as well (many first, under similar false claims). It's a broad brush that's applied to anyone that doesn't fit a far left agenda, or repeats truths about the far left that the far left doesn't like. (Hunter Biden, Denying Russiagate, Pointing out flaws in AGW, being experts demonstrating failures of COVID policies, and so on).
• (c) he still has a voice, so it doesn't hurt much - the kind rapist theory, since it didn't hurt that much, it's OK to violate their rights, social norms and the law.
• (d) this isn't any worse than a baker refusing service to a gay person - activist antagonizing a private business, who are NOT denied service (he said he'd sell them anything in store, just he wouldn't crate messages that disagreed with his religion), and his religious freedom trumping leftist tyranny -- is not the same thing as a bunch of tech companies together and changing their terms of service and promise in order to censor those telling uncomfortable truths (or even just lies/opinions they disagree with).

All those are bullshit and easily disproven, or highly ethically questionable, for those who have ethics. Progressive Democrats and their media that defend this need not apply.

It can't happen here... but it just did

❝ First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me — and there was no one left to speak for me ❞ ~ Martin Niemöller  ℹ️ U-Boat operator, who became a Nazi supporter, then grew to wake up and oppose it

In 1935 (before Orwell wrote 1984), Sinclair Lewis wrote how a US dictator could rise to power as Adolf Hitler did, in, "It can't happen here". I have news for you, it just did.

The plot was about how a power hungry politician promised each citizen $5,000 a year if they vote for him, then he and his supporters outlaws dissent then incarcerates political enemies. You know, like Biden did with Social program promises, and Twitter/Facebook and Google just did (and Apple is flirting with) with Social Media? So two of three complete.

Of course the dystopian novel goes on to eliminates individual states by subdividing the country into administrative sectors... I don't think that's coming literally. But America is the idea that people (not governments) should decide... and in order to do that, and be represented, all sides should be heard. Even the most vile. It is the idea that Americans get to choose to arm themselves. That they should not be attacked for who they are or what they believe. The Bidenophiles and Kamalabots are championing attacking the Constitution and the foundations of what makes us American: the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 10th amendments in our Bill of Rights, they subverted an election and want to do more so, they are pitching ideas about Senate Stacking by and adding DC as a State, and Supreme Court stacking. They have been proposing making two classes of people those who supported Trump and those who support fascism -- to the point where they want to guarantee that all Trump supporters and administration official are unemployable (at least in government).

In the novel when an industrialist is asked about government overreach in taxing/regulating/micromanaging industries for our own good, and isn't that what fascism means (back when Americans knew that's what fascism meant), the wealthy tech company owner dismisses it with the remark that it simply "can't happen here". As he's furthering it.

In the novel when people discover evidence of corrupt dealings by the leadership (like Hunter Biden), the powers suppress the information and attack the sources. Of course in the book, it's the leadership that does the attacking, in our case the Social Media, Search Engines, and Media giants did that for the powers so they wouldn't have to get their hands dirty.

The novel ends with many fleeing the collapsing republic, and others fighting -- with the midwest on the side of liberty and the coasts on the side of oppressive fascism and their Great Leader.

I was fascinated with Hitler, or more accurately with people that allowed him rise to power. How did good people let this happen? So I read dozens of books in my youth on the topic, this was one of them. How did it happen? People in Germany and Japan thought and said, "It can't happen here"... while it was happening. They tolerated oppression in the name of getting along (the Law of Jante) -- they believed in the collective (and not the individual), thus if the collective opposed it, they opposed it too. The other side wasn't just wrong, they were evil -- so doing evil to evil wasn't evil, it was prophylactic self defense. Anything could be justified, and eventually was. They took over educating the kids, and miseducated them that thoughts that disagreed with political correctness and the state should be expunged, along with the people that believe them or disagreed with their own ideology. Sound familiar?

Are you seeing it yet? Or are you part of the problem?

Will the last liberals turn out the lights?

While Michelle Obama and AOC and others show what an intolerance Fascist paradise the DNC has become, and the silence of the masses of Democrats screams louder than any speeches could... there are still a few almost liberals left in the party of intolerance.

• In the past the ACLU defended Nazi's and Pedophiles right to speech. In the present, they don't care enough to issue a clear statement on it. They kinda hint that while they completely hate Trump and understand why the Twitter mob did it, they waffle around that they half to make a half-hearted non-attempt at pretending to defend the civil liberties of free speech... or maybe not. Like defending the 2A, when it's the 1A of conservatives, they don't really care much.

• Glenn Greenwald of The Intercept, before he left for not being fanatically left enough (and because they censored him like they do to conservative PoV's), is a voice of sanity in the mostly silence of the supposed "Liberal" party. But you can count the Liberals left, on one hand, without using your thumb. Still, Greenwald's recent kerfuffle with the Intercept and being on the victim end of censorship is making him a nearly reasonable voice in the leftist lynchmob sea.

• Elon Musk is a bit of a classical liberal (libertarian leaning guy), with no love of Zuckerberg. He suggested you use Signal instead of WhatsApp, and Dorsey was right for once and retweeted the suggestion. Mostly because Signal has better security/privacy and partly because Zuc is a douche (and they don’t like each other), and partly because FB blocked Musk, SpaceX, and Tesla, because he wouldn’t cow-tow to what Zuc thought they should. I like that at least one high profile person is calling someone in tech out. Especially someone like Zuc that’s earned so much bad will.

• The President of Mexico (Lopez Obrador) spoke out immediately against it. as did Russian Dissident Alexei Navalny, showing they are more American (Liberal) than Joe Biden, his supporters, and the majority of the American media who supported it and remained silent.

• It took German Prime Minister, Angela Merkel a few days, but she also recognized the problem with the Trump ban. Of course her spin was the problem was that the legilsators didn't outlaw him, instead of letting businesses leaders do it.

• France also reacted negatively.

When you can get the Germans, French, Mexico to agree on something, that lets you know you fucked up. I expect that the EU will enact legislation to defend against Twitter doing that to any of them.

Civil War 101

Imagine you had read anything about history and were writing a "how to" manual on starting violence and destabilizing a population and causing backlash. Mine would include dividing us into intersection groups of "us's" and "them's" and then focusing on how to disenfranchise them until they retaliate by doing things like:

1. constantly insulting and attacking them as "privileged"/unworthy, morally inferior (white, racist, bigots, homophobes, capitalist, god and gun clingers, deplorable's, Trumper's)
2. claiming free speech only applies to your side, shout "them" down when they try to voice any dissent, censor them when they offer facts you don't like, call them bigots whenever you're losing an argument
3. tolerate assaults against "them" and their symbols/statues/history and values... but flip the fuck out if any of them do anything back -- especially when it is in a much smaller scale and with much more valid justification
4. undermine election confidence with policies that violate the law (like voting by mail, lack of voter role sanitization, removing observers and signature matching requirements, ignore deadlines, use shoddy software, refuse audits and transparency)
5. Attack anyone in that new victimhood group with threatening their jobs, ability to promote their businesses, express their views, suffocate their complaints, and any legal redress -- treat them with contempt under the law.
6. create two norms for justice -- one if you're an "us", another for "them"... then go on to deny they have any standing in the courts to complain -- so they have no voice, and no chance at justice
   
   

Basically, eliminate all legal path of recourse, or even the right to complain, and certainly the right to defend themselves. Then when you eliminate all legal paths of recourse, the only ones left are illegal. Complete contempt for the law and the government will be taught to a generation. And when they act on it? Never offer forgiveness, tolerance, or compassion... never let an opportunity go to waste to advance the leftist agenda. Use the backlash they created as an excuse to become MORE authoritarian and intolerant because people are rebelling against their illegal intolerance, until you have the rationalization and justification to re-educate, drive out, or slaughter them all. Just like men you admire like Mao, Castro, Che, or Chavez has done.

I am NOT rooting for it to happen... I'm begging for the other side to stop. At some point they're going to push all Americans into the choice of choosing America and the Constitution, or our Democrat Controlled Leadership. And nobody wins in that kind of either/or decision. The last time the progressives did it, it cost 500,000 Americans. I don't want to think about it again. But the only thing worse than the consequences of fighting, are the consequences of not fighting.

Conclusion

❝ Now the valley cried with anger, "Mount your horses! Draw your sword!" And they killed the mountain-people, So they won their just reward. Now they stood beside the treasure, On the mountain, dark and red. Turned the stone and looked beneath it... "Peace on Earth" was all it said. Go ahead and hate your neighbor, Go ahead and cheat a friend. Do it in the name of Heaven, You can justify it in the end. There won't be any trumpets blowing Come the judgement day, On the bloody morning after.... One tin soldier rides away. ❞ ~ Billy Jack theme ℹ️ Wikipedia:One Tin Soldier

Conservatives want freedom for both sides to decide for themselves what is right and wrong. They want the Constitution: freedom of speech, freedom of defense, freedom of capitalism. Progressives want to remove those choices and the voices that offend them, as demonstrated by their actions. And with that, the Conservatives became the Liberals, and the Liberals have been displaced by the fascists who don't even know they are fascists.

"One Tin Soldier" song tells the story of two neighboring tribes, the warlike (Silicon) Valley People and the peaceful Mountain (Time) Kingdom (conservative middle America) which possesses a great treasure buried under a stone. The Valley People demand the treasure. The Mountain People respond that they will share it with "their brothers", but not quick enough... so the Valley People invade and slaughter the Mountain People. On overturning the stone, they find nothing except the words "Peace On Earth" inscribed beneath it. The treasure was knowing that leaving each other alone leaves peace in your heart and your soul cleaner than progressive activism ever could.

If the DNC and their supporters don't grow up soon, that will be their legacy.

I fear that bias and disinformation from grade-schools and universities, our media and social media, the lack of critical thinking skills, compassion/tolerance and understanding for those that disagree with them, may have pushed our society as far as we can go without fracturing. Once the stress limits are exceeded, we enter very bad times for all. So activist/leftist politicians are playing dangerous games with national and global stability.

Joe Biden isn't even President yet and his supporters actions and his silence on the great purge, already tells us what kind of leader he is (or is not), and what kind of followers he attracts. They are far worse than what they vilified. Trump or his supporters never tried to deny a class of people access to public services like Social media, to target his supporters, or to instill (or tolerate) institutional bigotry into the policies of the government or public companies. Yet Democrats are. They are doing everything they claim to hate.

💭 Aftermath

Twitter Stock got hammered on the first day of trading after this. Analyst warned (rightly) that profits could go down ≈10% because of so many high profile people fleeing, or being driven off. But I think he underestimates the longer term effects and is only looking at the next quarter. Instead of a clear road ahead for continual growth and customers, Twitter just told all conservatives (at least 75M Americans that voted for Trump, and more globally), that they can never trust Twitter and need to find an alternate platform. So even if they colluded with Apple/Google/Amazon to crush Parler, their biggest competition, there's many others on the horizon, and now a clear need has been relayed and received to go away. There's also the ramifications of various lawsuits like anti-Trust (they're now clearly on the map for that kind of litigation), and regulation. They are making editorial decisions instead of being an agnostic platform. Gab deliciously mocked Twitter for the crash on twitter (tweeting "lost $4B LOL"), twitter responded by deleting their tweet: reiterating Twitter's contempt for free speech that offends them (and shows they're easily offended).

---

👁️ See also

• Thought Crime - George Orwell wrote his cautionary book titled Nineteen Eighty-Four about what progressive lefists would become.
• Thought Police - When there are people that reward/punish good and bad ideas, that's the thought police.
• Digital Kristallnacht - Biden supporters demanded and acted on Digital Kristallnacht: attacking/banning conservatives on Social Media to heal us.
• Orwellian - George Orwell warned of the decline of civilization through Socialism, Collectivism, and Group-Think.
• 2+2≈1984 - This is about 2+2=5, and the mind-fuck in George Orwell's book about Socialism, titled: nineteen eighty-four (1984).
• 2+2≈1984 - This is about 2+2=5, and the mind-fuck in George Orwell's book about Socialism, titled: nineteen eighty-four (1984).

🔗 More

Facebook Facebook is 3 things: bad interface, bad management, and biased policies.

Twitter Twitter is an enemy of free speech and tolerance.

Apple Some things I've experienced or observed while working at/for/with Apple.

Google Two 20-something created a Web crawler, then a few OK products sold by an anti-American hate cult.

Woke Leftist terms mean the opposite. "Woke" means asleep about the true agenda: it's Marxism wrapped in Social Justice costume.

Amazon I was neither advocate nor foe of Amazon, but they converted me to foe through censorship and new CEO's douchebaggery.

Thought Crime George Orwell wrote his cautionary book titled Nineteen Eighty-Four about what progressive lefists would become.

Joe Biden Lifelong racist, child sniffer and gaffe machine became 46th President under illegal election and thinnest margin.

Fascism Fascism came from Socialism, called themselves socialists, and acted like Socialists. Some pretend they are "right wing".

Bans Facebook claims it's not partisan; just ignore their political contributions, bans, restrictions, etc.

Thought Police When there are people that reward/punish good and bad ideas, that's the thought police.

Dog Whistle Accuse the opposition of meaning something other than what the words mean. Guilt by assumption of the prosecution.

🔗 Links

• Wikipedia: Kristallnacht
• Wikipedia: Never again
• https://www.dailywire.com/news/democrats-cheer-twitter-for-engaging-in-political-censorship-heal-and-find-a-common-path-forward
• Evading the ban: https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2021/01/08/here-are-screenshots-of-the-4-tweets-twitter-just-deleted-from-the-official-potus-account/
• https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2021/01/09/9-big-tech-platforms-that-have-blacklisted-president-donald-trump/
• https://redstate.com/streiff/2021/01/09/amazon-apple-google-block-parler-n307503
• Billy Jack Theme: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yh-JoW_8qw0
• Great Summary: https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2021/01/11/the-libfascist-purge-n2582903

Tags: Facebook  Twitter  Apple  Google  Woke  Amazon  Thought Crime  Biden  Fascism  Facebook/Bans  Thought Police  Dog Whistle